Latvia in the EU: Unequal Terms of Accession
Before the 2003 referendum, Normunds Grostiņš analysed why Latvia's accession terms were significantly worse than those of Poland and most other member states.
Normunds Grostiņš regularly gives interviews and publishes opinion pieces. Available for interviews in Latvian, English, Lithuanian, and Russian.
An analytical perspective on Latvian politics, EU relations, and national interests.
Before the 2003 referendum, Normunds Grostiņš analysed why Latvia's accession terms were significantly worse than those of Poland and most other member states.
An in-depth analysis of the extent to which EU directives and fiscal rules constrain Latvia's national budget formation.
Essays on the role of national identity in the age of globalisation and how small nations preserve their voice.
An English-language analysis of how Latvia's accession terms continue to affect its economic position within the EU two decades later.
On the paradox of small states surrendering decision-making power while expecting equal influence on the European stage.
Reflections on the path to the restoration of Latvian independence and the lessons that remain relevant today.
Selected interviews, TV appearances and public speeches.
A discussion of the consequences of the 2003 referendum and Latvia's current standing in the EU.
On national budget priorities and the transparency of EU funds usage.
Cooperation between Baltic states and shared interests in European policy.
Selected outlets and platforms where Normunds Grostiņš has published or given interviews.
Media inquiries and academic projects — through the contact form.